Suburban Law Enforcement Academy (SLEA) BA State Certification Practice Exam

Is Officer Welte justified in handcuffing John, who is considered an escape risk?

1. Yes

2. No

3. Only with backup

4. Only if John is violent

The correct answer is: Yes

Handcuffing an individual who is considered an escape risk can be justified based on several factors, particularly in the interest of officer safety and the protection of the public. When law enforcement officers identify someone as an escape risk, they are acting prudently by using handcuffs to prevent the individual from fleeing or potentially causing harm during a situation where control may be necessary. Proper training often emphasizes that when an officer perceives a risk—either to themselves, the individual, or bystanders—using handcuffs can be a necessary procedure to mitigate those risks. By securing an individual with handcuffs, officers are able to maintain control of the situation and reduce the likelihood of an escape, which is especially important if the person has a known history or implication of being a flight risk. Factors such as the individual’s prior behavior, the context of the arrest, and the presence of other officers all support the decision to use handcuffs as a form of physical restraint. In this scenario, Officer Welte's decision to handcuff John aligns with standard law enforcement practices when handling individuals deemed a risk for escaping, reflecting a sound judgment for maintaining safety during an interaction.